Sunday, February 24, 2013

Rap- Music?





I like rap

MC Hammer pants. Beautiful.


I know that sometimes surprises some people that meet me. They think "good, wholesome LDS guy who studied music in college; shouldn't he have better taste?" I say this not as a matter of assumption, but from personal experience.



First and foremost, I would like to refute the erroneous idea that rap isn't music. One of my Music Theory professors at the university defined music as 
"organized sound over time" 
with an asterisk over the first word, meaning that organization as a necessity was debatable. Does rap fit this description? Absolutely. And yet, sometimes people argue "but they’re not singing, so it counts for less."




Here’s a transcription of Smashmouth's hit song "All Star":

You’ll notice that in the first four bars, approximately 2/3 of the words are on the same pitch (tonic/"do") without a lot of pitch variance elsewhere in these bars or in the other verses of the song.





Here’s Andy Grammer's "Keep Your Head Up"

First four bars again and Grammer also sings nearly 2/3 of his words on the same tonic pitch. I do not mention these examples to disparage their musical value in any way, but rather to demonstrate how much songs like this, which fall squarely in the "alternative" or "pop" category, have in common with rap.




Now here's the first four bars of Sean Paul's "So Fine"


It should be noted that Sean Paul is actually singing these pitches; this is not an approximation. The number of times Paul repeats tonic is a mere 9% higher than that of Smashmouth and Grammer, yet people count it as less musical.




And let us not forget "Gone Til November" by rapper Wyclef Jean


Here, Jean sings tonic less than 25% of the time, yet he is classified as a rapper. Oh, and that G natural in the fourth measure? It’s a borrowed minor third from the blues scale. Not too shabby for a guy who isn't a musician.




There are dozens of rappers like Jean and Paul who sing their raps as part of the songs' harmonic structure. Some high profile examples are B.o.B, Nelly, Andre 3000, Timbaland, Mos Def, C-Lo Green and there are plenty more that rap verses and sing choruses.




But what about the others? I quote William Shatner:



I can’t get behind so-called singers, who can’t carry a tune, get paid for talking. How easy is that?






These are the Kanye's, 50's and Dre's of the genre who make a living out of talking to a beat. I mean, where’s the talent in that? Here’s where:





I woke up early this morning with a new state of mind,
A creative way to rhyme without using knives and guns-
Keep your nose out the sky, keep your heart to God and
Keep your face to the rising sun.
                -Kanye West, Family Business


You woulda been much more than a mouth to feed
Someone, I woulda fed this information I read to
Someone, my life for you, I woulda had to leave,
Instead I led you to death.
                -Common, Retrospect for Life




 Come listen to my truest thoughts, my truest feelings
All my peers doing years beyond drug dealing
How many caskets can we witness
Before we see it’s hard to live the life without God?
So we must ask forgiveness.
                -2Pac, Unconditional Love




The best rappers are incredible poets with an individual and important perspective on the world's problems. I'm not going to champion all of rap music because, as with all genres of music, there are killers and there are fillers. But under no circumstances should anyone think to banish the entire rap genre into the nether regions of "not good music" or even "too unholy." All genres have goods and bads and it is up to you, reader, to keep an open mind and to find what you like and what speaks to you.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

A Grammy to the Highest Bidder...



Here's a list of the Grammy award winners of "Best Album of the Year," along with its RIAA Certification based on how many units it sold. Don't pore over it if you are in a rush, just glance at the right-hand column as you scroll down.

Gold: 500,000 units
Platinum: 1,000,000 units
Diamond: 10,000,000 units

 Platinum
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Gold
Platinum
11x Platinum
Platinum
4x Platinum
8x Platinum
10x Platinum
George Harrison & Friends
Gold
 N/A
 N/A
Gold
10x Platinum
19x Platinum
Bee Gees/Various artists
15x Platinum
7x Platinum
5x Platinum
3x Platinum
3x Platinum
29x Platinum
Diamond
12x Platinum
5x Platinum
Diamond
Diamond
Diamond
Platinum
7x Platinum
Diamond
17x Platinum
Platinum
16x Platinum
11x Platinum
Platinum
8x Platinum
15x Platinum
2x Platinum
8x Platinum
Diamond
11x Platinum
Ray Charles and Various Artists
3x Platinum
3x Platinum
2x Platinum
 N/A
Platinum
6x Platinum
Gold
Diamond

Note: These statistics are units sold inside the United States only; many of these albums were even more successful globally.



I don't plan to comment much on these statistics. I just want to draw attention to the overwhelming majority of “Best Album of the Year” Grammys which were awarded after huge commercial success. I can imagine two possible explanations:

            1. The American people's taste in music is so good that we are naturally attracted to music worthy of awards and we buy it for the same reasons that it was nominated for the Grammy.

-or-

            2. An underlying requirement of this award is that the artist and album be well-known enough that the American public won’t be left scratching their heads asking “Who?”



I am more inclined to believe in the second explanation. For one, the other nominations almost always fall into the same category of household-name artists with a commercially successful album. Also, the Grammy awards are perpetuated by the American public who, frankly, don't usually like to try new things; were the Grammys overloaded with unknown indy artists foreign to the mainstream ear, the award would likely lose popularity, rather than spreading fame to the newcomers. Because many utilize music as an accompaniment in the background of life, rather than an independent art form to be appreciated in itself, we only have the capacity to opine on musics that are thrust upon us through the radio, MTV, and Spotify ads.

There is a third possibility- only commercially successful artists have the money necessary to create effective music, the sort that wins Grammys, a hypothesis supported by the extremely low number of breakout albums that are even nominated for this award. But this I refuse to believe.

So, if we assume that an album has to have enough renown to have made some money (or vice versa) to win “Best Album of the Year,” then the prize because somewhat less impressive because the competition is much less steep. Back in 1959, judging between every album released that year would have meant choosing between a few hundred records; only looking at the certified Gold albums, on the other hand (which does include all of the 1959 nominations), drained the pool down to a mere 30 (a). This strainer effect is even more drastic nowadays. In 2009 an estimated 98,000 albums were released onto the market (b), yet only 1,200 sold more than 10,000 copies which, according to the hypothesis, doesn't even qualify them for the running.

I'm not honestly suggesting that the Grammy committee endeavor to listen to every single synthesized smooth-jazz arrangement of Christmas tunes that comes out every year, nor I am I trying to sap the fun out of the Grammys. I guess I just want everyone to remember that the term "Best Album of the Year" should be taken with a big cube of salt since music is one of the most subjective art forms on the planet.

So dang the man, don't let him tell you what's good! Pick your own best albums, whatever makes you feel alive.